Abstract: We offer a two-step algorithmic approach to the problems of inconsistency and bias in legal decision making. First, we propose a new tool for reducing inconsistency: Judgmental Bootstrapping Models (“JBMs”) built with machine learning methods. JBMs, by providing judges with recommendations generated from statistical models of themselves, can help those judges make better and more consistent decisions. To illustrate these advantages, we build a JBM of release decisions for the California Board of Parole Hearings. Second, we describe a means to address systematic biases that are...